Many Republicans foolishly thought they could create a limited health-care program for kids and avoid ending up with full blown HillaryCare. What they didn't seem to appreciate was that Schip was itself a baby step toward universal health care.
--Mary Katherine Stout in the Wall Street Journal, 25 August 2007
Our current system, non-universal health care:
"If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait until you see how expensive it is when it's free."
-- P. J. O'Rourke
Posted by: The Sanity Inspector | 01 September 2007 at 03:55
Yet funnily enough, all the countries with universal health care pay less per capita than Americans do.
Posted by: Sedulia | 05 September 2007 at 09:24
True--if you don't count all the lost time they have to wait for treatment, and all the people who die while doing so.
Fee-for-services can certainly hurt--but it only hurts once. High taxes for crummy, unmotivated service is a chronic ailment.
Posted by: The Sanity Inspector | 11 September 2007 at 03:33
Have you ever actually lived in France or Germany and experienced the care there? It is simply not true that people there die waiting for services. This is a myth that I keep hearing from Americans with no experience with single-payer systems. Why do you believe this?
I never had or heard of delays being treated in more than 20 years in Europe. In fact I find it's much harder to get a fast doctor's appointment in the U.S..
It is much more common for an American to have a heartbreaking medical-expense dilemma than it is for a person in a single-payer system. The bottom line is, no one, even the most conservative people, in those countries wants to switch to OUR system.
I believe your myth of delays and waits comes from the actual, serious problems in the U.K. system-- which developed only when anti-government Margaret Thatcher set about deliberately weakening the universal health care system there.
Posted by: Sedulia | 11 September 2007 at 22:06