Twenty-five years ago it was the fashion for those who considered themselves enlightened and progressive to cry out against intolerance as the one damning sin of our time.
The agitation was well-founded and it resulted in the elimination from our social system of many elements that are crude and unjust. But in the general revolution that has followed, has not more been lost than gained?
It is better to be narrow-minded than to have no mind, to hold limited and rigid principles than none at all.
That is the danger which faces so many people today-- to have no considered opinions on any subject, to put up with what is wasteful and harmful with the excuse that there is "good in everything" -- which in most cases means inability to distinguish between good and bad.
There are things which are still worth fighting against.
--Evelyn Waugh (1903-1966), 1932
From Evelyn Waugh: The Early Years 1903-1939 (pub. 1987, Norton), by Martin Stannard.
Allan Bloom agrees:
I once had a debate about education with a professor of psychology. He said that it was his function to get rid of prejudices in his students....I began to wonder what he replaced those prejudices with....I found myself responding... that I personally tried to teach my students prejudices, since nowadays--with the general success of his method-- they had learned to doubt beliefs even before they had any.
--Allan Bloom (d. 1992, The Closing of the American Mind (pub.1987)